1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 2004 Lincoln Aviator
To start off, 2004 Lincoln Aviator is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln Aviator (302 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Aviator should accelerate faster than 1998 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 995 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln Aviator (407 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (186 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln Aviator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 2004 Lincoln Aviator | |
Make | Fiat | Lincoln |
Model | Bravo | Aviator |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 85 L |