1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 2006 Isuzu I-280
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (186 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Fiat Bravo | 2006 Isuzu I-280 | |
| Make | Fiat | Isuzu |
| Model | Bravo | I-280 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1908 cc | 2770 cc |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 175 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 74 L |
