1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (186 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Fiat Bravo. 2007 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 1998 Fiat Bravo has manual transmission. 1998 Fiat Bravo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Fiat Bravo | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Bravo | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1908 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 226 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 90 mm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |
