1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 2013 Honda Pilot
To start off, 2013 Honda Pilot is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Honda Pilot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Pilot (247 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Pilot should accelerate faster than 1998 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Pilot weights approximately 766 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda Pilot (343 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (186 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Honda Pilot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Fiat Bravo. 2013 Honda Pilot has automatic transmission and 1998 Fiat Bravo has manual transmission. 1998 Fiat Bravo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda Pilot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 2013 Honda Pilot | |
Make | Fiat | Honda |
Model | Bravo | Pilot |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 3471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 247 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4861 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1995 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1846 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2775 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |