1998 Ford Contour vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1998 Ford Contour is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Contour (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Contour weights approximately 502 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Contour | 1962 Renault 8 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Contour | 8 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2280 mm |