1998 Ford Contour vs. 1963 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1998 Ford Contour is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Contour (195 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1963 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1963 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Contour weights approximately 156 kg more than 1963 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Contour (224 Nm @ 5625 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Toyota Crown. (152 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Contour | 1963 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Contour | Crown |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2544 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5625 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.4 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 22.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1411 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |