1998 Ford Contour vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Ford Contour is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Contour (195 HP @ 6625 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Contour weights approximately 91 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Contour (224 Nm @ 5625 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Contour | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Contour | Cedric |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2544 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6625 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5625 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1411 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |