1998 Ford Cougar vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A

To start off, 1998 Ford Cougar is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Cougar (128 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Cougar weights approximately 181 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Ford Cougar 1951 Jeep CJ3A
Make Ford Jeep
Model Cougar CJ3A
Year Released 1998 1951
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2199 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 128 HP 59 HP
Torque 176 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1291 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 3130 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1460 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2040 mm