1998 Ford Cougar vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1998 Ford Cougar is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Cougar (128 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 5 kg more than 1998 Ford Cougar.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Cougar | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Cougar | CJ |
Year Released | 1998 | 1985 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1291 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2380 mm |