1998 Ford Cougar vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Cougar (128 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Cougar | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Cougar | Megane |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.8 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80.5 mm |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |