1998 Ford F-150 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1998 Ford F-150 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford F-150 (203 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford F-150 (338 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford F-150 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-150 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 203 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2210 mm |
