1998 Ford F-150 vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford F-150 (203 HP) has 135 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1998 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford F-150 | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | F-150 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 203 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2360 mm |
