1998 Ford F-250 vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford F-250 (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Juke. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Juke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford F-250 weights approximately 909 kg more than 2013 Nissan Juke. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford F-250 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1998 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Juke.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford F-250 | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-250 | Juke |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 1441 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2530 mm |