1998 Ford F-250 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford F-250 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 279 kg more than 1998 Ford F-250.
Because 1998 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford F-250. (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford F-250 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F-250 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 474 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 2629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1598 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 3320 mm |
