1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (235 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 280 kg more than 1998 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Falcon | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Falcon | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 164 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3690 mm |
