1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1956 Triumph 10 Break
To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 820 kg more than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Falcon | 1956 Triumph 10 Break | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Falcon | 10 Break |
Year Released | 1998 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 760 kg |