1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Cougar. (217 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 165 kg more than 1998 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Cougar (432 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Ford Falcon 1967 Mercury Cougar
Make Ford Mercury
Model Falcon Cougar
Year Released 1998 1967
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3984 cc 7003 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 221 HP 217 HP
Engine RPM 4900 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 357 Nm 432 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1680 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2830 mm