1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1972 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 650 kg more than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Falcon (395 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Nissan Bluebird.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Ford Falcon 1972 Nissan Bluebird
Make Ford Nissan
Model Falcon Bluebird
Year Released 1998 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 1428 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 235 HP 72 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 395 Nm 116 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 930 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4130 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2430 mm