1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1972 Renault 4
To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1972 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 861 kg more than 1972 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Falcon | 1972 Renault 4 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | 4 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |