1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1978 Volvo 164

To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 164.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Falcon (395 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 164.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Ford Falcon 1978 Volvo 164
Make Ford Volvo
Model Falcon 164
Year Released 1998 1978
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 2998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 235 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 395 Nm 204 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 5610 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 3350 mm