1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (225 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 818 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Falcon | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Falcon | 66 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
