1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 810 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Falcon (395 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Falcon | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Falcon | 102 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 395 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2160 mm |