1998 Ford Falcon vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (225 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 550 kg more than 1992 Rover 216. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 216, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Falcon (370 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 216. (140 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 216. 1998 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1992 Rover 216 has manual transmission. 1992 Rover 216 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Falcon | 1992 Rover 216 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Falcon | 216 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 370 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |
