1998 Ford Focus vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1998 Ford Focus is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Focus (128 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Focus weights approximately 159 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Focus (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Focus | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Focus | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |