1998 Ford Ka vs. 1967 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1998 Ford Ka is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. Both 1998 Ford Ka and 1967 Nissan Bluebird are equipped with a 1,299 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 50 kg more than 1998 Ford Ka.
Because 1967 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Ka | 1967 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ka | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2390 mm |