1998 Ford Ka vs. 1972 Saab 99
To start off, 1998 Ford Ka is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Saab 99 would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Saab 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Saab 99 (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1998 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Saab 99 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Saab 99 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1998 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Saab 99 (167 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 Saab 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Ka | 1972 Saab 99 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Ka | 99 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 62 L |