1998 Ford Ka vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (78 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1998 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Ka.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Ka | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Ka | KB |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 76 L |