1998 Ford Maverick vs. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1998 Ford Maverick is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,050 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Maverick (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Maverick. (198 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Maverick | 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
| Make | Ford | Studebaker |
| Model | Maverick | Silver Hawk |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2389 cc | 3050 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
