1998 Ford Maverick vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Ford Maverick is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Maverick (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Maverick (198 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Maverick | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Maverick | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2389 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
