1998 Ford Mustang vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Mustang | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
