1998 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 1998 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Mustang weights approximately 520 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 1998 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Mustang | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Mustang | 100 1.4 D |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 89 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 81.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
