1998 Ford Puma vs. 1980 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1998 Ford Puma is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Puma weights approximately 155 kg more than 1980 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Puma | 1980 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Puma | 850 K |
Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |