1998 Ford Puma vs. 1981 Renault 4
To start off, 1998 Ford Puma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1981 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Puma weights approximately 315 kg more than 1981 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Puma (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 4. (63 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 4.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Puma | 1981 Renault 4 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Puma | 4 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |