1998 Ford Puma vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1998 Ford Puma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Puma weights approximately 160 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Puma | 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Puma | Pajero |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
