1998 Ford Puma vs. 2000 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2000 Nissan El Grand is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Puma would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 960 kg more than 1998 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Puma | 2000 Nissan El Grand | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Puma | El Grand |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1950 mm |