1998 Ford Puma vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Puma would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Puma. (125 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Puma | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Puma | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1998 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2380 mm |