1998 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1998 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher.
Because 1998 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Ranger | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 626 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |