1998 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 1998 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Ranger | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Ranger | CL |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
