1998 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2010 Subaru Forester is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 2010 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Ranger | 2010 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Ranger | Forester |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
