1998 Ford Royale vs. 1956 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1998 Ford Royale is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1998 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Royale.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Royale | 1956 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Royale | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1956 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2060 mm |