1998 Ford Royale vs. 1990 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1998 Ford Royale is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1998 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Royale.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Royale. (173 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Royale | 1990 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Royale | XJR |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 377 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 102 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
