1998 Ford Royale vs. 1992 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 1998 Ford Royale is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Tracer (127 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1998 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Tracer should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercury Tracer. (154 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Royale | 1992 Mercury Tracer | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | Royale | Tracer |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1839 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 154 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |
