1998 Ford Royale vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Royale would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1998 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Royale.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Royale. (173 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Royale. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 1998 Ford Royale has manual transmission. 1998 Ford Royale will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Royale | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Royale | SSU |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |