1998 Ford Taurus vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 1998 Ford Taurus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Taurus (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Taurus (264 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 1998 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Taurus | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Taurus | Aronde |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 264 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
