1998 Ford Taurus vs. 1971 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1998 Ford Taurus is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Taurus (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1971 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Taurus (264 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Taurus | 1971 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Taurus | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 264 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
