1998 Ford Taurus vs. 1992 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Ford Taurus is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Mazda 323 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Taurus | 1992 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | 323 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2370 mm |