1998 Ford Taurus vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Taurus (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Taurus (264 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Taurus | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Taurus | R2 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 264 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |