1998 Ford Taurus vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Taurus (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Taurus (264 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Taurus | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | MX |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 264 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |