1998 Ford Telstar vs. 1979 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Ford Telstar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Telstar weights approximately 400 kg more than 1979 Mazda 323.
Because 1979 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mazda 323 has automatic transmission and 1998 Ford Telstar has manual transmission. 1998 Ford Telstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Telstar | 1979 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Telstar | 323 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |