1998 Ford Telstar vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Telstar (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 2 weights approximately 54 kg more than 1998 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Telstar (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Telstar | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Telstar | 2 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |